La “circoscritta (e puntellata) area” di incostituzionalità dell’art. 580 c.p. fra self-restraint della Corte costituzionale e perdurante inerzia del legislatore

Authors

  • Maria Esmeralda Bucalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-519

Keywords:

End-of-life, assisted suicide, additive decision, declaration of unconstitutionality, Parliament’s discretion

Abstract

With the decision on the “Cappato case” the Constitutional Court did not create the right to medically assisted suicide, which, moreover, the constitutional order does not contemplate, but only identified a “circumscribed area” of unconstitutionality of art. 580 of the Italian Criminal Code, supporting it with regulatory and procedural props. In this way, the Court demonstrated its self-restraint respectful of Parliament’s discretion and underlined the persistence of the need for legislative intervention in such a sensitive matter.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-10

Issue

Section

Focus on

How to Cite

1.
La “circoscritta (e puntellata) area” di incostituzionalità dell’art. 580 c.p. fra self-restraint della Corte costituzionale e perdurante inerzia del legislatore. BioLaw [Internet]. 2020 Mar. 10 [cited 2026 Jul. 7];(1):99-121. Available from: https://teseo-ojs35-test.archicoop.it/biolaw/article/view/1463

Most read articles by the same author(s)