Too many rules or zero rules for the ChatGPT?

Authors

  • Giovanna De Minico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-2723

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, ChatGpt, regulation, Digital Services Act, A.I. ACT

Abstract

The paper puts forward a fundamental question: which rules for ChatGPT?

It starts with an examination of the state of the art, which oscillates between the zero rules of the Digital Services Act and the over-regulation of the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. The Parliament’s amendments to the proposal (May 11th 2023) intervene on some issues: they transform the solitary and quasi-objective accountability of the provider into the chain of accountability between the former and the developer. But grey areas remain in the absence of prior control over the fake information generated by our Chat. The Author concludes by steering the regulatory regime to the goal of combining fundamental freedoms with technical innovation.

This work has been developed by Prof. De Minico within the framework of the PNRR MUR Project PE0000013-FAIR.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-20

Issue

No. 2 (2023)

Section

Artificial Intelligence and Law - Perspectives

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

1.
Too many rules or zero rules for the ChatGPT?. BioLaw [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 20 [cited 2026 Jul. 7];(2):491-50. Available from: https://teseo-ojs35-test.archicoop.it/biolaw/article/view/2723

Most read articles by the same author(s)